And to say this isn't random? Of course, a challenge, and perhaps how it can work now. And stable large objects, indeed do this job better. So this would be some mechanism we would like to see, where larger gravitational objects, can begin forming skeletons in this region, of course. With heavy space, the information of how energy is flowing and moving through a space, would become at least partially clear or derivable. This is to say, without heavy-space, how to coordinate outside of mere local interactions? This would result in some chaos, yes! And these objects, have no strict need at this time, to consume deeply, although this may also occur in a growth stage. Larger objects may receive signals that indeed, a vertex cover does not exist in many places, and spinor space is under-utilized. And, in the case where there is a pre-determined or pre-existing spacial schema, one in which energy flows (picture early galactic formation), there would be field communication, which colloquially or humanly, could be said as, "There is a high level of communication between heavy-space particles, and non-heavy space particles, which occurs largely at spinor dimensions, and influences internal dimensions and fields." Gravitational waves, so to speak, creating the beat or rhythm which constrains the number of possible interactions (loose here). ^^There may be "elongating" or "energetic" events which occur, and attempt to occur, as particles become close enough (no walking challenge). So we'd see something interesting, perhaps like a "large" atom (not here yet, ruff, squak). If there is a bias toward spacial dimensions which contain vertices, or something which is very, very much like a vertice, we could see this as influential in this view. There is also this question, why atoms form apparently only in our 4D space-time. If space is busy enough, small regions of heavy space could be explanatory, if true, as to why the universe is so good at building things. Simulated, we could say that a star-or-smaller event becoming complete, becomes a high probability, once one or more of these events occurs. And the event in which these spaces become close to one another, could be deeply, deeply, profound. It could even be the case, that indeed, hydrogen atoms have their own corollaries in heavy space, regions which become excited when close to molecules with similar predisposition, where vectors are unlikely to repel a potential interaction. In this view, particles and atoms would interact strongly at certain points of space-time, and weakly in others, and their would be clear descriptions of these occurrences at all levels.Įven weak gravity could be seen as profound, from the perspective of two atoms seeking to enjoin something resembling the heavy pull of newtonian objects, where relative to surrounding spaces, fields are highly influential. In this view, much of the building forces would occur within atoms spinor space could be seen as "binary" in an oversimplified view close particles could largely energize the surrounding space, creating enough inertia, for grouping. One possibility, there is only a weak interaction with space. So how does this, in simple terms, lead to hydrogen atoms, which have enough force to keep a nucleus together, and enough force, to also keep a few electrons around, and perhaps even become ionized enough, to form interesting aggregations, which eventually become stars? Overtime, this forms a tapestry that resembles orthogonal space, and can provide enough energy that it makes sense for atoms to begin appearing. Lets assume that my last supposition is true: spinor space can act as a feed-line for complex development. At the highest of levels, the apparently chaotic world of quantum things, can become stable enough to form even larger quantum things, and even more so, stable and attractive enough to become something as "permanent" as an atom, the fundamental building blocks of astrophysics (and astrology). Symmetry events are pretty wild to think about. Does Space-Time create fundamental biases for internal dimensions of fundamental particles? If so, what is this mechanism? Is it purely localized, or is this a property of space? Do particle events need to be described relative to their surrounding spacial planes? Can I write this right now? Could I write this after eating some fucking pretzel buns? Lets find out.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |